<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 485 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117103</link>
    <description>Technical know-how and engineering transfer charges were held includible in the assessable value of imported machinery where the supply of machinery and the know-how arrangement formed one interdependent collaboration contract for manufacture of metallised products. Because the know-how payment was linked to the supply of the goods and operated as a condition of sale, it formed part of the transaction value under Rule 9(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. The challenge to exclusion of that payment therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 485 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117103</link>
      <description>Technical know-how and engineering transfer charges were held includible in the assessable value of imported machinery where the supply of machinery and the know-how arrangement formed one interdependent collaboration contract for manufacture of metallised products. Because the know-how payment was linked to the supply of the goods and operated as a condition of sale, it formed part of the transaction value under Rule 9(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. The challenge to exclusion of that payment therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>