<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 351 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS &amp;  CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117059</link>
    <description>The judgment concluded that refunds resulting from finalization of provisional assessments, even if excess duty collected is returned through credit notes or adjustments, do not violate the bar of unjust enrichment under Rule 7(6) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The refunds sanctioned to the company were deemed proper and legal, leading to the rejection of the Review Applications for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:25:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 351 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS &amp;  CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117059</link>
      <description>The judgment concluded that refunds resulting from finalization of provisional assessments, even if excess duty collected is returned through credit notes or adjustments, do not violate the bar of unjust enrichment under Rule 7(6) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The refunds sanctioned to the company were deemed proper and legal, leading to the rejection of the Review Applications for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>