<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 469 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116996</link>
    <description>Under the Chit Funds Act scheme, a foreman&#039;s commission or remuneration accrues at each draw, because the right to receive it arises then under the chit agreement and statutory structure; it cannot be deferred to the completion of the chit by shifting from the mercantile system to the completion method, so that accounting change was rejected. Generators run on petrol or diesel were also found outside the depreciation category reserved for wind energy or other renewable energy devices, so the higher depreciation claim was disallowed. The note thus confirms that income recognition follows the point of accrual under the chit framework and that depreciation depends on the specific asset classification applicable under the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 469 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116996</link>
      <description>Under the Chit Funds Act scheme, a foreman&#039;s commission or remuneration accrues at each draw, because the right to receive it arises then under the chit agreement and statutory structure; it cannot be deferred to the completion of the chit by shifting from the mercantile system to the completion method, so that accounting change was rejected. Generators run on petrol or diesel were also found outside the depreciation category reserved for wind energy or other renewable energy devices, so the higher depreciation claim was disallowed. The note thus confirms that income recognition follows the point of accrual under the chit framework and that depreciation depends on the specific asset classification applicable under the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>