https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116991 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand in a case involving a discrepancy in the balance stock of kraft paper, as the goods were available in an unregistered godown. However, the appellant was held liable for a penalty of Rs. 5,000 for contravening Central Excise rules by moving goods to the unregistered godown without informing Revenue authorities. The penalty aimed to enforce compliance and uphold the integrity of the excise system. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:02:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116991 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand in a case involving a discrepancy in the balance stock of kraft paper, as the goods were available in an unregistered godown. However, the appellant was held liable for a penalty of Rs. 5,000 for contravening Central Excise rules by moving goods to the unregistered godown without informing Revenue authorities. The penalty aimed to enforce compliance and uphold the integrity of the excise system. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116991