https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116978 The Tribunal upheld the decision that the extended period of limitation was not applicable. The classification of goods as articles of Chromium under SH 8112.00 was accepted, and there was no suppression of facts by the respondent, negating the invocation of the extended period for duty demand. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal. en-us Thu, 04 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:26:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116978 The Tribunal upheld the decision that the extended period of limitation was not applicable. The classification of goods as articles of Chromium under SH 8112.00 was accepted, and there was no suppression of facts by the respondent, negating the invocation of the extended period for duty demand. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116978