<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 312 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116969</link>
    <description>Pre-stressed concrete girders used in bridge construction were treated as excisable goods because they satisfied the tests of manufacture and marketability, and the site-construction exemption was held inapplicable. The demand was treated as timely because suppression of manufacturing activity, absence of excise registration, non-maintenance of records, and clearances without duty or documentation justified the extended limitation period. Confiscation and penalty were upheld on the same footing as a similar Larger Bench approach, while interest was left open only for quantification by the lower authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:49:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 312 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116969</link>
      <description>Pre-stressed concrete girders used in bridge construction were treated as excisable goods because they satisfied the tests of manufacture and marketability, and the site-construction exemption was held inapplicable. The demand was treated as timely because suppression of manufacturing activity, absence of excise registration, non-maintenance of records, and clearances without duty or documentation justified the extended limitation period. Confiscation and penalty were upheld on the same footing as a similar Larger Bench approach, while interest was left open only for quantification by the lower authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>