https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116961 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting a refund for excess differential duty paid by the appellant, a manufacturer of explosives. It recognized the provisional nature of pricing due to ongoing contract negotiations, distinguishing the case from the MRF precedent. The Tribunal emphasized unjust enrichment considerations, aligning with the appellant's arguments, and provided consequential relief. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116961 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting a refund for excess differential duty paid by the appellant, a manufacturer of explosives. It recognized the provisional nature of pricing due to ongoing contract negotiations, distinguishing the case from the MRF precedent. The Tribunal emphasized unjust enrichment considerations, aligning with the appellant's arguments, and provided consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116961