https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116933 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi granted the stay petition and scheduled the appeal for listing in early 2006. The waiver of the remaining duty amount was allowed based on the applicant's argument for classification of aerobridges under Heading No. 8428 of the Customs Tariff, supported by past practices of Custom authorities and the differentiation between aerobridges and bridge-sections as per the HSN Explanatory notes. The amount already paid by the applicant was deemed sufficient for the appeal hearing, leading to the decision to waive the pre-deposit of duty. en-us Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:15:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116933 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi granted the stay petition and scheduled the appeal for listing in early 2006. The waiver of the remaining duty amount was allowed based on the applicant's argument for classification of aerobridges under Heading No. 8428 of the Customs Tariff, supported by past practices of Custom authorities and the differentiation between aerobridges and bridge-sections as per the HSN Explanatory notes. The amount already paid by the applicant was deemed sufficient for the appeal hearing, leading to the decision to waive the pre-deposit of duty. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116933