<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 635 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116927</link>
    <description>Stamp duty valuation cannot, by itself, be treated as the actual sale consideration for computing a deemed gift where no independent material shows that the declared consideration was understated. The analysis follows a coordinate bench view that the Sub-Registrar&#039;s value is only a stamp duty benchmark and does not establish the real transaction price in the absence of contrary evidence. On that basis, the deemed gift computation based solely on the stamp duty value was not sustainable, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 635 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116927</link>
      <description>Stamp duty valuation cannot, by itself, be treated as the actual sale consideration for computing a deemed gift where no independent material shows that the declared consideration was understated. The analysis follows a coordinate bench view that the Sub-Registrar&#039;s value is only a stamp duty benchmark and does not establish the real transaction price in the absence of contrary evidence. On that basis, the deemed gift computation based solely on the stamp duty value was not sustainable, and the assessee succeeded on the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>