<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 634 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116926</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeals by directing the Assessing Officer to adjust the computation of deduction under section 80HHC, following precedents to ignore losses and increase profits by the incentive amount. The ITAT also allowed interest on the refund until the date of issuing the refund, based on a Supreme Court judgment. Certain grounds related to the treatment of indirect expenditure were not decided as they did not survive, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of those specific grounds not pressed during arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:44:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 634 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116926</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeals by directing the Assessing Officer to adjust the computation of deduction under section 80HHC, following precedents to ignore losses and increase profits by the incentive amount. The ITAT also allowed interest on the refund until the date of issuing the refund, based on a Supreme Court judgment. Certain grounds related to the treatment of indirect expenditure were not decided as they did not survive, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of those specific grounds not pressed during arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>