https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116894 The Tribunal granted an unconditional stay to the applicants for the appeal hearing concerning the recovery of duty amounting to Rs. 2,07,32,142. It was found that the applicants did not charge any excess amount beyond the revised price when the excise duty was shown as nil post the issuance of Notification No. 30/93. The Tribunal concluded that Section 11D was not applicable in this case, providing clarity on duty payment and exemption benefits to customers. The appeal was scheduled for a later date, ensuring a fair hearing for the parties involved. en-us Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:06:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116894 The Tribunal granted an unconditional stay to the applicants for the appeal hearing concerning the recovery of duty amounting to Rs. 2,07,32,142. It was found that the applicants did not charge any excess amount beyond the revised price when the excise duty was shown as nil post the issuance of Notification No. 30/93. The Tribunal concluded that Section 11D was not applicable in this case, providing clarity on duty payment and exemption benefits to customers. The appeal was scheduled for a later date, ensuring a fair hearing for the parties involved. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116894