<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 704 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that premiums received on surrender of import licenses, whether own or purchased, were to be treated as incentives under section 28(iiib) and should be excluded from the total turnover for computing the deduction under section 80HHC of the I.T. Act. Following a precedent set by the Bombay High Court, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing their appeal and dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 704 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that premiums received on surrender of import licenses, whether own or purchased, were to be treated as incentives under section 28(iiib) and should be excluded from the total turnover for computing the deduction under section 80HHC of the I.T. Act. Following a precedent set by the Bombay High Court, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing their appeal and dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>