<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 316 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that deemed exports can be considered for the DTA quota of a 100% EOU under Notification No. 23/2003, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s reliance on physical exports. The Tribunal emphasized strict adherence to the notification&#039;s terms and found no explicit exclusion of deemed exports. It granted a full waiver of pre-deposit amounts and stayed recovery pending the appeal hearing, based on the appellant&#039;s prima facie case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:21:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 316 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that deemed exports can be considered for the DTA quota of a 100% EOU under Notification No. 23/2003, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s reliance on physical exports. The Tribunal emphasized strict adherence to the notification&#039;s terms and found no explicit exclusion of deemed exports. It granted a full waiver of pre-deposit amounts and stayed recovery pending the appeal hearing, based on the appellant&#039;s prima facie case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>