<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 501 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116859</link>
    <description>The extended period of limitation cannot be invoked to deny Cenvat credit where the assessee has disclosed the relevant facts in prescribed returns and statements. Disclosure of credit on capital goods spares in Form-1, together with capital goods credit register extracts and monthly returns, put the department on notice of the availment of credit. On those facts, suppression was not sustainable, so the longer limitation period was unavailable and the demand failed on limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:23:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 501 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116859</link>
      <description>The extended period of limitation cannot be invoked to deny Cenvat credit where the assessee has disclosed the relevant facts in prescribed returns and statements. Disclosure of credit on capital goods spares in Form-1, together with capital goods credit register extracts and monthly returns, put the department on notice of the availment of credit. On those facts, suppression was not sustainable, so the longer limitation period was unavailable and the demand failed on limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>