<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 308 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116846</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the ROM application as no finding was recorded on the confiscation of land, plant, machinery in the Final Order. The Tribunal set aside the confiscation as the demand of nearly Rs. 1 Crore did not warrant such severe action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 308 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116846</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the ROM application as no finding was recorded on the confiscation of land, plant, machinery in the Final Order. The Tribunal set aside the confiscation as the demand of nearly Rs. 1 Crore did not warrant such severe action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>