<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 697 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116845</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of prima facie adjustments for both the bonus commission and conveyance allowance. The judgment emphasizes that prima facie adjustments under section 143(1)(a) necessitate conclusive evidence of inadmissibility based on the return and accompanying documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:40:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 697 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116845</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of prima facie adjustments for both the bonus commission and conveyance allowance. The judgment emphasizes that prima facie adjustments under section 143(1)(a) necessitate conclusive evidence of inadmissibility based on the return and accompanying documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>