<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 305 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116842</link>
    <description>A mistaken, non-conscious failure to avail SSI exemption was held not to amount to an irrevocable exercise of option under para 2(i) of Notification No. 8/2001-C.E., because the clearances on normal duty arose from a misconception of law. On that basis, the assessee was treated as not barred from claiming the concessional SSI benefit under Notification No. 9/2001-C.E. where Cenvat credit had been availed. The refund claim was not finally decided on merit and was remanded for fresh examination of unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:09:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 305 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116842</link>
      <description>A mistaken, non-conscious failure to avail SSI exemption was held not to amount to an irrevocable exercise of option under para 2(i) of Notification No. 8/2001-C.E., because the clearances on normal duty arose from a misconception of law. On that basis, the assessee was treated as not barred from claiming the concessional SSI benefit under Notification No. 9/2001-C.E. where Cenvat credit had been availed. The refund claim was not finally decided on merit and was remanded for fresh examination of unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>