<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 297 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116833</link>
    <description>A manufacturer&#039;s election under the compounded levy scheme binds only for the relevant year, and it does not automatically carry forward to a subsequent period. Where the assessee had expressly opted out for the later year, the earlier annual capacity determination could not sustain a fresh demand. In the absence of a revised determination of annual capacity of production for 1998-99, confirmation of duty under Rule 96ZP(3) was not justified. The demand was therefore held unsustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:36:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 297 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116833</link>
      <description>A manufacturer&#039;s election under the compounded levy scheme binds only for the relevant year, and it does not automatically carry forward to a subsequent period. Where the assessee had expressly opted out for the later year, the earlier annual capacity determination could not sustain a fresh demand. In the absence of a revised determination of annual capacity of production for 1998-99, confirmation of duty under Rule 96ZP(3) was not justified. The demand was therefore held unsustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>