<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 287 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the ROM application, rectifying errors in the original order regarding the payment of interest for the refund claim. The judgment emphasized compliance with statutory provisions, directing payment of interest in accordance with rates set by the Central Government under specified notifications, to be paid three months from the date of the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:46:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 287 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the ROM application, rectifying errors in the original order regarding the payment of interest for the refund claim. The judgment emphasized compliance with statutory provisions, directing payment of interest in accordance with rates set by the Central Government under specified notifications, to be paid three months from the date of the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>