<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 364 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116815</link>
    <description>A recall of a final order was allowed because the earlier order had been founded on facts taken from a different matter and was therefore irrelevant to the present appeal on excisability of newsprint. The tribunal held that an order based on unrelated facts could not stand, recalled Final Order No. 361/2005-B, allowed the review/recall application, and directed that the appeal be re-listed after fresh notice to the assessee for hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:37:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 364 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116815</link>
      <description>A recall of a final order was allowed because the earlier order had been founded on facts taken from a different matter and was therefore irrelevant to the present appeal on excisability of newsprint. The tribunal held that an order based on unrelated facts could not stand, recalled Final Order No. 361/2005-B, allowed the review/recall application, and directed that the appeal be re-listed after fresh notice to the assessee for hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>