https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116813 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of excess goods and the demand due to lack of evidence supporting the appellant's claims of preparing trucks for invoicing and discrepancies in production records. However, the demand for suppression of value was deemed unsustainable as evidence showed goods were cleared at negotiated prices due to quality concerns. Penalties were set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:18:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116813 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of excess goods and the demand due to lack of evidence supporting the appellant's claims of preparing trucks for invoicing and discrepancies in production records. However, the demand for suppression of value was deemed unsustainable as evidence showed goods were cleared at negotiated prices due to quality concerns. Penalties were set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116813