https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116811 The Tribunal rejected the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not entitled to a refund claim for excess duty paid due to time bar, lack of locus standi, and unjust enrichment. The decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of the case facts and legal principles, with the Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal both upholding the rejection of the refund claim. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:08:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116811 The Tribunal rejected the appeal, ruling that the appellant was not entitled to a refund claim for excess duty paid due to time bar, lack of locus standi, and unjust enrichment. The decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of the case facts and legal principles, with the Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal both upholding the rejection of the refund claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116811