<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 359 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116810</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai classified brass vent/weights of a pressure cooker under Heading 7418 instead of 7419. The parts made of brass were deemed to fall under Heading 7418 for kitchen articles like pressure cookers, regardless of the cooker&#039;s material. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 359 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116810</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai classified brass vent/weights of a pressure cooker under Heading 7418 instead of 7419. The parts made of brass were deemed to fall under Heading 7418 for kitchen articles like pressure cookers, regardless of the cooker&#039;s material. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>