<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 451 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that despite the restricted nature of the imported goods, confiscation and penalty were not justified as the items were deemed waste and scrap upon melting. The decision to accept the declared value for assessment was upheld, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the importer, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:54:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 451 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that despite the restricted nature of the imported goods, confiscation and penalty were not justified as the items were deemed waste and scrap upon melting. The decision to accept the declared value for assessment was upheld, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the importer, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>