<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 447 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116793</link>
    <description>Imported wood patterns were treated as classifiable under Heading 84.80, which covers moulding patterns, and not excluded merely because a Chapter 44 classification was also suggested. Since Chapter 84 falls within Section XVI and goods under Heading 84.80 were covered as capital goods under Rule 57Q during the relevant period, CVD credit was admissible. The Revenue&#039;s objection based on Chapter 44 classification was rejected, and Modvat credit to the assessee was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:46:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 447 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116793</link>
      <description>Imported wood patterns were treated as classifiable under Heading 84.80, which covers moulding patterns, and not excluded merely because a Chapter 44 classification was also suggested. Since Chapter 84 falls within Section XVI and goods under Heading 84.80 were covered as capital goods under Rule 57Q during the relevant period, CVD credit was admissible. The Revenue&#039;s objection based on Chapter 44 classification was rejected, and Modvat credit to the assessee was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>