https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116772 The appeal challenging the imposition of anti-dumping duty on vitrified/porcelain tiles from China PR and UAE was dismissed. The court upheld the decision to impose fixed duty, considering the substitutability of the imported tiles with domestically manufactured ones. The exclusion of mosaic tiles data from the analysis was deemed appropriate. The judgment emphasized the importance of a consistent approach in duty imposition to avoid unfair advantages or disadvantages to importers based on product variations. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:22:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116772 The appeal challenging the imposition of anti-dumping duty on vitrified/porcelain tiles from China PR and UAE was dismissed. The court upheld the decision to impose fixed duty, considering the substitutability of the imported tiles with domestically manufactured ones. The exclusion of mosaic tiles data from the analysis was deemed appropriate. The judgment emphasized the importance of a consistent approach in duty imposition to avoid unfair advantages or disadvantages to importers based on product variations. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116772