<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 280 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116758</link>
    <description>The court upheld the grant of Modvat credit for both Electric bulbs and Rubber Strips, emphasizing their essential role in the manufacturing process and as protective devices in the factory. The decision was based on the specific entries for granting credit, the definition of Capital goods covering the relevant chapters, and the precedents set by previous Tribunal rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 280 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116758</link>
      <description>The court upheld the grant of Modvat credit for both Electric bulbs and Rubber Strips, emphasizing their essential role in the manufacturing process and as protective devices in the factory. The decision was based on the specific entries for granting credit, the definition of Capital goods covering the relevant chapters, and the precedents set by previous Tribunal rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>