<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 278 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116756</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Supreme Marbles &amp;amp; Granites Ltd., overturning the confiscation and redemption fine related to a machine initially cleared for testing without duty payment but subsequently cleared after payment of appropriate duty. The decision was based on compliance with duty payment requirements and provisions of the EPCG Scheme, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument of confiscation due to the initial clearance description.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 278 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116756</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Supreme Marbles &amp;amp; Granites Ltd., overturning the confiscation and redemption fine related to a machine initially cleared for testing without duty payment but subsequently cleared after payment of appropriate duty. The decision was based on compliance with duty payment requirements and provisions of the EPCG Scheme, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument of confiscation due to the initial clearance description.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>