https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116753 Contradictory final orders passed in connected appeals arising from the same penalty dispute created an apparent mistake where each appeal was disposed of without notice of the other. That inconsistency justified recall of the earlier orders so the assessee's appeal and the Revenue's appeal could be heard together and decided consistently. The applications were allowed only to that extent: the conflicting orders were set aside and the appeals were restored for composite hearing, with no determination on the merits of the penalty issue. en-us Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:12:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116753 Contradictory final orders passed in connected appeals arising from the same penalty dispute created an apparent mistake where each appeal was disposed of without notice of the other. That inconsistency justified recall of the earlier orders so the assessee's appeal and the Revenue's appeal could be heard together and decided consistently. The applications were allowed only to that extent: the conflicting orders were set aside and the appeals were restored for composite hearing, with no determination on the merits of the penalty issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116753