<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 272 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116750</link>
    <description>An exemption under Notification No. 23/98-Cus. cannot be denied merely because the prescribed Ministry certificate was not available at import and clearance, where the importer had applied in advance, sought provisional assessment, and later produced the certificate once issued by the competent public authority. The decisive consideration was that issuance of the certificate was beyond the importer&#039;s exclusive control, and the substantive condition of approval for the project and use of the goods for that project was ultimately satisfied. Delayed production of the certificate did not defeat entitlement to the exemption, and denial of benefit on that ground was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:00:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 272 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116750</link>
      <description>An exemption under Notification No. 23/98-Cus. cannot be denied merely because the prescribed Ministry certificate was not available at import and clearance, where the importer had applied in advance, sought provisional assessment, and later produced the certificate once issued by the competent public authority. The decisive consideration was that issuance of the certificate was beyond the importer&#039;s exclusive control, and the substantive condition of approval for the project and use of the goods for that project was ultimately satisfied. Delayed production of the certificate did not defeat entitlement to the exemption, and denial of benefit on that ground was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>