https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116737 An interim stay that had lapsed after the statutory 180-day period was revived in the interest of justice because the appeal could not be heard earlier due to heavy docket pendency. The Tribunal treated the delayed extension request as justified on the facts and directed that the earlier interim relief continue during the pendency of the appeal. It also ordered the matter to be listed for final hearing on a specified date, noting the amount involved and the case circumstances. en-us Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:09:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116737 An interim stay that had lapsed after the statutory 180-day period was revived in the interest of justice because the appeal could not be heard earlier due to heavy docket pendency. The Tribunal treated the delayed extension request as justified on the facts and directed that the earlier interim relief continue during the pendency of the appeal. It also ordered the matter to be listed for final hearing on a specified date, noting the amount involved and the case circumstances. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116737