<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 578 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116712</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of foreign travel expenses and consultancy charges due to lack of evidence. It partially allowed the appeal on repairs and maintenance expenses, treating most as revenue in nature. The Tribunal fully allowed the appeal on legal and professional fees, emphasizing the principle of commercial expediency. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:38:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 578 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116712</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of foreign travel expenses and consultancy charges due to lack of evidence. It partially allowed the appeal on repairs and maintenance expenses, treating most as revenue in nature. The Tribunal fully allowed the appeal on legal and professional fees, emphasizing the principle of commercial expediency. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>