<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 429 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116685</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, in a case concerning rebate for excess sugar production, upheld the recovery of the excess rebate granted to the appellants. It found that the letter from the Collector&#039;s office did not constitute an adjudicating order and that the correct procedure was followed in recovering the excess rebate. The Tribunal concluded that the show cause notice was issued within the required timeframe and rejected the appeal, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and the lack of grounds for challenging the duty demand under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:26:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 429 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116685</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, in a case concerning rebate for excess sugar production, upheld the recovery of the excess rebate granted to the appellants. It found that the letter from the Collector&#039;s office did not constitute an adjudicating order and that the correct procedure was followed in recovering the excess rebate. The Tribunal concluded that the show cause notice was issued within the required timeframe and rejected the appeal, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and the lack of grounds for challenging the duty demand under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>