https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116679 The Tribunal held that once an appeal is disposed of by the appellate authority, there should be no further orders on the same matter. The Commissioner (Appeals) issuing a second order after the initial appeal disposition was found to be invalid. The first order in 1996 disposing of the appeal was deemed valid, while the second order in 1999 was declared null and void as it had no basis. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following the correct sequence of orders in administrative proceedings for the validity and effectiveness of decisions. en-us Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:17:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116679 The Tribunal held that once an appeal is disposed of by the appellate authority, there should be no further orders on the same matter. The Commissioner (Appeals) issuing a second order after the initial appeal disposition was found to be invalid. The first order in 1996 disposing of the appeal was deemed valid, while the second order in 1999 was declared null and void as it had no basis. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following the correct sequence of orders in administrative proceedings for the validity and effectiveness of decisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116679