https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116672 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous order that confirmed duty demand on inputs due to shortages at the factory. The decision emphasized the lack of concrete evidence for clandestine removal of inputs and the importance of proving such allegations beyond doubt. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the statutory account entries and the failure to consider in-process stock, ultimately providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:46:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116672 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous order that confirmed duty demand on inputs due to shortages at the factory. The decision emphasized the lack of concrete evidence for clandestine removal of inputs and the importance of proving such allegations beyond doubt. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the statutory account entries and the failure to consider in-process stock, ultimately providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116672