<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 470 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116669</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and upheld the penalties and confiscation imposed on the appellant for importing natural rubber at a port not specified in the DGFT Notification. The Tribunal found no jurisdictional issue with the notification and emphasized the need for compliance with the specified import regulations outlined in the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:38:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 470 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116669</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and upheld the penalties and confiscation imposed on the appellant for importing natural rubber at a port not specified in the DGFT Notification. The Tribunal found no jurisdictional issue with the notification and emphasized the need for compliance with the specified import regulations outlined in the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>