https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116659 An appeal directed against an attachment order, rather than the underlying adjudication order, was held not to justify appellate interference. The Tribunal found no merit in the challenge because the appellant had not attacked the order determining liability, but only the recovery attachment issued for Government dues. On that basis, the request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay relief was declined, and the appeal was dismissed along with the stay petition. The impugned recovery proceedings were left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:45:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116659 An appeal directed against an attachment order, rather than the underlying adjudication order, was held not to justify appellate interference. The Tribunal found no merit in the challenge because the appellant had not attacked the order determining liability, but only the recovery attachment issued for Government dues. On that basis, the request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay relief was declined, and the appeal was dismissed along with the stay petition. The impugned recovery proceedings were left undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116659