<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 316 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116639</link>
    <description>On job-work manufacture of fabrics, valuation had to follow the Ujagar Prints cost construction formula of raw material cost plus job charges. Cut-pieces emerging during processing could not be separately valued at a lower market price merely because they fetched less in trade, where the same cost elements were involved in their production. The market-fetch basis was therefore not acceptable for such job-work goods, and the cut-pieces were not to be treated as rags for valuation purposes. The revenue&#039;s cost-based valuation approach was sustained and the assessee&#039;s lower valuation was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 316 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116639</link>
      <description>On job-work manufacture of fabrics, valuation had to follow the Ujagar Prints cost construction formula of raw material cost plus job charges. Cut-pieces emerging during processing could not be separately valued at a lower market price merely because they fetched less in trade, where the same cost elements were involved in their production. The market-fetch basis was therefore not acceptable for such job-work goods, and the cut-pieces were not to be treated as rags for valuation purposes. The revenue&#039;s cost-based valuation approach was sustained and the assessee&#039;s lower valuation was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>