<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 304 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116626</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the denial of Modvat credit on job work charges for constructing the vacuum pan, stating credit is only admissible on goods, not labor charges. However, the Tribunal allowed credit on ladders and gratings used to access sugar manufacturing machinery, as they are essential for production. Therefore, the appeal was partially allowed regarding the admissibility of credit on ladders and gratings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:51:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 304 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116626</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the denial of Modvat credit on job work charges for constructing the vacuum pan, stating credit is only admissible on goods, not labor charges. However, the Tribunal allowed credit on ladders and gratings used to access sugar manufacturing machinery, as they are essential for production. Therefore, the appeal was partially allowed regarding the admissibility of credit on ladders and gratings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>