<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 578 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116620</link>
    <description>The case involved various issues such as disallowance of expenses under different heads, treatment of perquisites, and investment allowances. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances on several expenses, including gifts, litigation, retainership fees, legal charges, and entertainment expenses. It also allowed investment allowances on specific assets and directed the Assessing Officer to charge interest where applicable. Overall, the Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on earlier appellate orders, statutory requirements, and judicial precedents, resulting in the dismissal or reduction of disallowances on numerous expense items and allowances on investments and perquisites.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 578 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116620</link>
      <description>The case involved various issues such as disallowance of expenses under different heads, treatment of perquisites, and investment allowances. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances on several expenses, including gifts, litigation, retainership fees, legal charges, and entertainment expenses. It also allowed investment allowances on specific assets and directed the Assessing Officer to charge interest where applicable. Overall, the Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on earlier appellate orders, statutory requirements, and judicial precedents, resulting in the dismissal or reduction of disallowances on numerous expense items and allowances on investments and perquisites.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>