<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 298 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116619</link>
    <description>The CCE (Appeals) modified the order, confirming duty demands on a soap manufacturer&#039;s multi piece package but setting aside penalties and interest. The duty demand on extra soaps was not upheld, and payment for these was acknowledged. The judgment clarified valuation for Central Excise Duty, interpreting a Board Circular on MRP declarations. The Revenue&#039;s penalty appeal was rejected, interest allowed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal to dismiss the multi piece package demand was granted, disposing of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:26:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 298 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116619</link>
      <description>The CCE (Appeals) modified the order, confirming duty demands on a soap manufacturer&#039;s multi piece package but setting aside penalties and interest. The duty demand on extra soaps was not upheld, and payment for these was acknowledged. The judgment clarified valuation for Central Excise Duty, interpreting a Board Circular on MRP declarations. The Revenue&#039;s penalty appeal was rejected, interest allowed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal to dismiss the multi piece package demand was granted, disposing of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>