https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116615 The Supreme Court remanded the case to the Tribunal to determine the comparability of yarn produced by the appellant for itself and on a job work basis. The Tribunal found that the goods were not comparable due to significant differences in types of yarn and timing of price comparisons. It was noted that lower authorities erred in considering the goods as comparable despite these differences. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the previous order, ruling in favor of the appellant and granting appropriate relief. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:54:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116615 The Supreme Court remanded the case to the Tribunal to determine the comparability of yarn produced by the appellant for itself and on a job work basis. The Tribunal found that the goods were not comparable due to significant differences in types of yarn and timing of price comparisons. It was noted that lower authorities erred in considering the goods as comparable despite these differences. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the previous order, ruling in favor of the appellant and granting appropriate relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116615