<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 577 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow 25% of entertainment expenses attributable to employees and deleted the disallowance of gift expenses. It ruled the entire research and development expenditure as deductible, rejecting deferred revenue expenditure. The disallowance of commission payments was upheld due to insufficient evidence. The Tribunal allowed the deduction of club membership fees for the Managing Director but disallowed the deduction of income tax liability. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with deductions granted and denied based on established precedent and available evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 577 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow 25% of entertainment expenses attributable to employees and deleted the disallowance of gift expenses. It ruled the entire research and development expenditure as deductible, rejecting deferred revenue expenditure. The disallowance of commission payments was upheld due to insufficient evidence. The Tribunal allowed the deduction of club membership fees for the Managing Director but disallowed the deduction of income tax liability. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with deductions granted and denied based on established precedent and available evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>