<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 417 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s request for provisional release of imported goods based on the interpretation of Section 18 of the Customs Act, highlighting that once a final order is issued by the Commissioner, provisional release under Section 18 is not feasible. The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for provisional release, emphasizing that the law does not permit provisional release once a final order is issued by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:41:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 417 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s request for provisional release of imported goods based on the interpretation of Section 18 of the Customs Act, highlighting that once a final order is issued by the Commissioner, provisional release under Section 18 is not feasible. The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for provisional release, emphasizing that the law does not permit provisional release once a final order is issued by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>