<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 414 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116606</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It was ruled that conversion charges for processes not amounting to &#039;manufacture&#039; should not be included in the assessable value of goods cleared. The judgment emphasized the consistent application of the Board&#039;s circular and previous Tribunal decisions in similar cases, highlighting that cutting charges by a job worker outside the factory gate were not to be added to the assessable value of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:09:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 414 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116606</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It was ruled that conversion charges for processes not amounting to &#039;manufacture&#039; should not be included in the assessable value of goods cleared. The judgment emphasized the consistent application of the Board&#039;s circular and previous Tribunal decisions in similar cases, highlighting that cutting charges by a job worker outside the factory gate were not to be added to the assessable value of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>