<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 403 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116593</link>
    <description>The penalty imposed on the Executive Director for alleged involvement in clandestine removal of finished goods was set aside as there was no concrete evidence linking him to the substitution of semi-finished goods. The Commissioner reduced the penalty from Rupees five lakh to Rupees 35,000, ultimately allowing the Executive Director&#039;s appeal and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. Additionally, the confiscation of semi-finished goods stored with finished goods was overturned as the incomplete nature of the goods rendered them unusable as intended gaskets, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:12:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 403 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116593</link>
      <description>The penalty imposed on the Executive Director for alleged involvement in clandestine removal of finished goods was set aside as there was no concrete evidence linking him to the substitution of semi-finished goods. The Commissioner reduced the penalty from Rupees five lakh to Rupees 35,000, ultimately allowing the Executive Director&#039;s appeal and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. Additionally, the confiscation of semi-finished goods stored with finished goods was overturned as the incomplete nature of the goods rendered them unusable as intended gaskets, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>