<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 398 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116587</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for the provisional release of imported goods, citing that since a final order had been passed by the Commissioner, provisional release under Section 18 of the Customs Act was not permissible by law. The decision was based on legal precedents and the clear provisions of the Customs Act, emphasizing compliance with the law in considering the provisional release of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:53:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 398 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116587</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for the provisional release of imported goods, citing that since a final order had been passed by the Commissioner, provisional release under Section 18 of the Customs Act was not permissible by law. The decision was based on legal precedents and the clear provisions of the Customs Act, emphasizing compliance with the law in considering the provisional release of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>