https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116586 The appellant successfully contested duty demands on free supply of receivers, notional interest on advances, installation and commissioning charges, and advertisement costs incurred by dealers. The court found the demands unsustainable due to lack of evidence, incorrect attribution, unrelated charges, and unjustified inclusion of dealer costs. The denial of Modvat credit was confirmed, but the overall appeal was ruled in favor of the appellant, granting relief from duty demands and penalties. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:50:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116586 The appellant successfully contested duty demands on free supply of receivers, notional interest on advances, installation and commissioning charges, and advertisement costs incurred by dealers. The court found the demands unsustainable due to lack of evidence, incorrect attribution, unrelated charges, and unjustified inclusion of dealer costs. The denial of Modvat credit was confirmed, but the overall appeal was ruled in favor of the appellant, granting relief from duty demands and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116586