<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 395 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116584</link>
    <description>Duty could not be demanded on the assumed waste of base yarn arising during texturising where the authorities treated loss and waste as the same. The Tribunal noted that, on the facts found, the matter was covered by its earlier view that waste yarn remained exempt during the relevant period. As the alleged short levy rested only on exempt waste yarn, no excise duty demand could be sustained on that component, and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 395 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116584</link>
      <description>Duty could not be demanded on the assumed waste of base yarn arising during texturising where the authorities treated loss and waste as the same. The Tribunal noted that, on the facts found, the matter was covered by its earlier view that waste yarn remained exempt during the relevant period. As the alleged short levy rested only on exempt waste yarn, no excise duty demand could be sustained on that component, and the demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>