<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 391 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116580</link>
    <description>An apparent error in the operative portion of a final order may be rectified where it prematurely fixes penalty before duty liability is determined. The rectification modified the earlier directions by sending the matter back to the Original Authority for re-quantification of duty and by keeping the question of penalty open. The revised directions stated that no penalty would arise if the duty liability is nil, but suitable penalties may be imposed if any duty liability survives. The principle applied is that penalty cannot be conclusively determined until the underlying duty issue is first settled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 391 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116580</link>
      <description>An apparent error in the operative portion of a final order may be rectified where it prematurely fixes penalty before duty liability is determined. The rectification modified the earlier directions by sending the matter back to the Original Authority for re-quantification of duty and by keeping the question of penalty open. The revised directions stated that no penalty would arise if the duty liability is nil, but suitable penalties may be imposed if any duty liability survives. The principle applied is that penalty cannot be conclusively determined until the underlying duty issue is first settled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>